Key differences
Crime rate /1k: Hammersmith and Fulham (103) is ahead of City of London (460)
Safety score: Hammersmith and Fulham (71/100) is ahead of City of London (11/100)
Transport: City of London (81/100) is ahead of Hammersmith and Fulham (52/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Hammersmith and Fulham has a stronger safety score — 71/100 vs 11/100. Hammersmith and Fulham is more affordable at £650k median vs £860k.
City of London scores higher on transport, but Hammersmith and Fulham is the more affordable option.
Best for
City of London
City of London is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Best for
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith and Fulham suits families and those prioritising a low-crime neighbourhood.
City of London vs Hammersmith and Fulham: what the data says
Overall, Hammersmith and Fulham scores higher on liveability (68/100 vs 70/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Hammersmith and Fulham is more affordable — median price £650k vs £860k in City of London, a difference of around 24%. Over the past year prices changed +0.1% in City of London and 0.0% in Hammersmith and Fulham.
Hammersmith and Fulham has a lower crime rate (103 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 460 in City of London). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
City of London edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 81/100 vs 52/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →