Brent vs City of London

Side-by-side comparison across crime, schools, property prices and transport — based on LondonIQ's London data.

Brent
62/100 liveability
City of London
68/100 liveability
These boroughs are closely matched — 2 metrics each. The right choice depends on your priorities.

Head-to-head comparison

MetricBrentCity of London
Liveability62/10068/100
Median price£549k£893k
Safety score—/100—/100
Crime rate /1k81447
Transport64/10075/100
Zone 1 commute— min— min
Good schools—%—%
Investment score—/100—/100

Brent vs City of London: what the data says

Overall, City of London scores higher on liveability (62/100 vs 68/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.

Property in Brent is more affordable — median price £549k vs £893k in City of London, a difference of around 38%. Over the past year prices changed +11.3% in Brent and +3.7% in City of London.

Brent has a lower crime rate (81 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 447 in City of London). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.

City of London edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 75/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions

Compare any two London postcodes

The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.

Open postcode comparison tool →

Related comparisons

Brent vs Barking and DagenhamBrent vs BarnetBrent vs BexleyCity of London vs BromleyCity of London vs CamdenCity of London vs Croydon
Browse all 33 London boroughs →