Key differences
Crime rate /1k: Kensington and Chelsea (136) is ahead of City of London (460)
Safety score: Kensington and Chelsea (64/100) is ahead of City of London (11/100)
Transport: City of London (81/100) is ahead of Kensington and Chelsea (59/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Kensington and Chelsea has a stronger safety score — 64/100 vs 11/100. City of London is more affordable at £860k median vs £935k.
City of London is cheaper, but Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on safety.
Best for
City of London
City of London is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Best for
Kensington and Chelsea
Kensington and Chelsea suits families and those prioritising a low-crime neighbourhood.
City of London vs Kensington and Chelsea: what the data says
Overall, Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on liveability (68/100 vs 72/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in City of London is more affordable — median price £860k vs £935k in Kensington and Chelsea, a difference of around 8%. Over the past year prices changed +0.1% in City of London and -6.2% in Kensington and Chelsea.
Kensington and Chelsea has a lower crime rate (136 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 460 in City of London). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
City of London edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 81/100 vs 59/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →