Key differences
Median price: Southwark (£518k) is ahead of Hammersmith and Fulham (£705k)
Crime rate /1k: Hammersmith and Fulham (49) is ahead of Southwark (59)
Liveability: Hammersmith and Fulham (72/100) is ahead of Southwark (69/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Hammersmith and Fulham and Southwark are closely matched across the key liveability metrics. Southwark is more affordable at £518k median vs £705k.
The areas are closely matched — the decision comes down to specific streets and personal priorities.
Best for
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith and Fulham suits buyers drawn to the specific character and amenities of this area.
Best for
Southwark
Southwark suits first-time buyers and value-focused buyers on tighter budgets.
Hammersmith and Fulham vs Southwark: what the data says
Overall, Hammersmith and Fulham scores higher on liveability (72/100 vs 69/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Southwark is more affordable — median price £518k vs £705k in Hammersmith and Fulham, a difference of around 27%. Over the past year prices changed +5.1% in Hammersmith and Fulham and +3.5% in Southwark.
Hammersmith and Fulham has a lower crime rate (49 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 59 in Southwark). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Southwark edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 53/100 vs 53/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →