Key differences
Crime rate /1k: Hammersmith and Fulham (49) is ahead of Westminster (282)
Median price: Hammersmith and Fulham (£705k) is ahead of Westminster (£940k)
Safety score: Hammersmith and Fulham (81/100) is ahead of Westminster (58/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Hammersmith and Fulham has a stronger safety score — 81/100 vs 58/100. Hammersmith and Fulham is more affordable at £705k median vs £940k.
Hammersmith and Fulham is cheaper, but Westminster scores higher on transport.
Best for
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith and Fulham suits families and those prioritising a low-crime neighbourhood.
Best for
Westminster
Westminster is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Hammersmith and Fulham vs Westminster: what the data says
Overall, Hammersmith and Fulham scores higher on liveability (72/100 vs 72/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Hammersmith and Fulham is more affordable — median price £705k vs £940k in Westminster, a difference of around 25%. Over the past year prices changed +5.1% in Hammersmith and Fulham and +10.5% in Westminster.
Hammersmith and Fulham has a lower crime rate (49 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 282 in Westminster). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Westminster edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 67/100 vs 53/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →