Key differences
Median price: Barnet (£444k) is ahead of Kensington and Chelsea (£935k)
Crime rate /1k: Barnet (82) is ahead of Kensington and Chelsea (136)
Transport: Kensington and Chelsea (59/100) is ahead of Barnet (31/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Kensington and Chelsea has a stronger transport score — 59/100 vs 31/100. Barnet is more affordable at £444k median vs £935k.
Barnet is cheaper, but Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on transport.
Best for
Barnet
Barnet suits families and those prioritising a low-crime neighbourhood.
Best for
Kensington and Chelsea
Kensington and Chelsea is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Barnet vs Kensington and Chelsea: what the data says
Overall, Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on liveability (59/100 vs 72/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Barnet is more affordable — median price £444k vs £935k in Kensington and Chelsea, a difference of around 53%. Over the past year prices changed +1.3% in Barnet and -6.2% in Kensington and Chelsea.
Barnet has a lower crime rate (82 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 136 in Kensington and Chelsea). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Kensington and Chelsea edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 59/100 vs 31/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →