Key differences
Crime rate /1k: Waltham Forest (81) is ahead of City of London (460)
Safety score: Waltham Forest (76/100) is ahead of City of London (11/100)
Transport: City of London (81/100) is ahead of Waltham Forest (37/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Waltham Forest has a stronger safety score — 76/100 vs 11/100. Waltham Forest is more affordable at £525k median vs £860k.
City of London scores higher on transport, but Waltham Forest is the more affordable option.
Best for
City of London
City of London is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Best for
Waltham Forest
Waltham Forest suits families and those prioritising a low-crime neighbourhood.
City of London vs Waltham Forest: what the data says
Overall, City of London scores higher on liveability (68/100 vs 62/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Waltham Forest is more affordable — median price £525k vs £860k in City of London, a difference of around 39%. Over the past year prices changed +0.1% in City of London and +0.2% in Waltham Forest.
Waltham Forest has a lower crime rate (81 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 460 in City of London). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
City of London edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 81/100 vs 37/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →