Key differences
Crime rate /1k: Waltham Forest (81) is ahead of Camden (202)
Median price: Waltham Forest (£525k) is ahead of Camden (£740k)
Transport: Camden (59/100) is ahead of Waltham Forest (37/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Camden has a stronger transport score — 59/100 vs 37/100. Waltham Forest is more affordable at £525k median vs £740k.
Camden scores higher on transport, but Waltham Forest is the more affordable option.
Best for
Camden
Camden is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Best for
Waltham Forest
Waltham Forest suits families and those prioritising a low-crime neighbourhood.
Camden vs Waltham Forest: what the data says
Overall, Camden scores higher on liveability (68/100 vs 62/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Waltham Forest is more affordable — median price £525k vs £740k in Camden, a difference of around 29%. Over the past year prices changed +2.7% in Camden and +0.2% in Waltham Forest.
Waltham Forest has a lower crime rate (81 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 202 in Camden). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Camden edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 59/100 vs 37/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →