Key differences
Median price: Croydon (£426k) is ahead of Hammersmith and Fulham (£705k)
Transport: Hammersmith and Fulham (53/100) is ahead of Croydon (36/100)
Liveability: Hammersmith and Fulham (72/100) is ahead of Croydon (59/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Hammersmith and Fulham has a stronger transport score — 53/100 vs 36/100. Croydon is more affordable at £426k median vs £705k.
Croydon is cheaper, but Hammersmith and Fulham scores higher on transport.
Best for
Croydon
Croydon suits first-time buyers and value-focused buyers on tighter budgets.
Best for
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith and Fulham is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Croydon vs Hammersmith and Fulham: what the data says
Overall, Hammersmith and Fulham scores higher on liveability (59/100 vs 72/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Croydon is more affordable — median price £426k vs £705k in Hammersmith and Fulham, a difference of around 40%. Over the past year prices changed +11.9% in Croydon and +5.1% in Hammersmith and Fulham.
Croydon has a lower crime rate (31 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 49 in Hammersmith and Fulham). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Hammersmith and Fulham edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 53/100 vs 36/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →