Key differences
Median price: Croydon (£426k) is ahead of Kensington and Chelsea (£1225k)
Crime rate /1k: Croydon (31) is ahead of Kensington and Chelsea (68)
Transport: Kensington and Chelsea (59/100) is ahead of Croydon (36/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Kensington and Chelsea has a stronger transport score — 59/100 vs 36/100. Croydon is more affordable at £426k median vs £1225k.
Croydon is cheaper, but Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on transport.
Best for
Croydon
Croydon suits first-time buyers and value-focused buyers on tighter budgets.
Best for
Kensington and Chelsea
Kensington and Chelsea is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Croydon vs Kensington and Chelsea: what the data says
Overall, Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on liveability (59/100 vs 74/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Croydon is more affordable — median price £426k vs £1225k in Kensington and Chelsea, a difference of around 65%. Over the past year prices changed +11.9% in Croydon and +13.3% in Kensington and Chelsea.
Croydon has a lower crime rate (31 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 68 in Kensington and Chelsea). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Kensington and Chelsea edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 59/100 vs 36/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →