Key differences
Median price: Lambeth (£540k) is ahead of Hammersmith and Fulham (£705k)
Liveability: Hammersmith and Fulham (72/100) is ahead of Lambeth (67/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Hammersmith and Fulham has a stronger liveability score — 72/100 vs 67/100. Lambeth is more affordable at £540k median vs £705k.
Hammersmith and Fulham scores higher on liveability, but Lambeth is the more affordable option.
Best for
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith and Fulham suits buyers who want the strongest overall quality of life.
Best for
Lambeth
Lambeth suits first-time buyers and value-focused buyers on tighter budgets.
Hammersmith and Fulham vs Lambeth: what the data says
Overall, Hammersmith and Fulham scores higher on liveability (72/100 vs 67/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Lambeth is more affordable — median price £540k vs £705k in Hammersmith and Fulham, a difference of around 23%. Over the past year prices changed +5.1% in Hammersmith and Fulham and +7.1% in Lambeth.
Hammersmith and Fulham has a lower crime rate (49 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 51 in Lambeth). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Lambeth edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 53/100 vs 53/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →