Key differences
Median price: Greenwich (£450k) is ahead of Waltham Forest (£530k)
Transport: Greenwich (46/100) is ahead of Waltham Forest (41/100)
Crime rate /1k: Waltham Forest (24) is ahead of Greenwich (30)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Greenwich has a stronger transport score — 46/100 vs 41/100. Greenwich is more affordable at £450k median vs £530k.
The areas are closely matched — the decision comes down to specific streets and personal priorities.
Best for
Greenwich
Greenwich is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Best for
Waltham Forest
Waltham Forest suits buyers drawn to the specific character and amenities of this area.
Greenwich vs Waltham Forest: what the data says
Overall, Waltham Forest scores higher on liveability (63/100 vs 64/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Greenwich is more affordable — median price £450k vs £530k in Waltham Forest, a difference of around 15%. Over the past year prices changed +12.4% in Greenwich and +39.5% in Waltham Forest.
Waltham Forest has a lower crime rate (24 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 30 in Greenwich). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Greenwich edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 46/100 vs 41/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →