Key differences
Transport: Waltham Forest (41/100) is ahead of Sutton (33/100)
Median price: Sutton (£472k) is ahead of Waltham Forest (£530k)
Crime rate /1k: Sutton (21) is ahead of Waltham Forest (24)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Waltham Forest has a stronger transport score — 41/100 vs 33/100. Sutton is more affordable at £472k median vs £530k.
Sutton is cheaper, but Waltham Forest scores higher on transport.
Best for
Sutton
Sutton suits first-time buyers and value-focused buyers on tighter budgets.
Best for
Waltham Forest
Waltham Forest is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Sutton vs Waltham Forest: what the data says
Overall, Waltham Forest scores higher on liveability (62/100 vs 64/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Sutton is more affordable — median price £472k vs £530k in Waltham Forest, a difference of around 11%. Over the past year prices changed +2.5% in Sutton and +39.5% in Waltham Forest.
Sutton has a lower crime rate (21 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 24 in Waltham Forest). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Waltham Forest edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 41/100 vs 33/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →