Key differences
Median price: Waltham Forest (£530k) is ahead of Kensington and Chelsea (£1225k)
Crime rate /1k: Waltham Forest (24) is ahead of Kensington and Chelsea (68)
Transport: Kensington and Chelsea (59/100) is ahead of Waltham Forest (41/100)
Head-to-head comparison
The Verdict
Kensington and Chelsea has a stronger transport score — 59/100 vs 41/100. Waltham Forest is more affordable at £530k median vs £1225k.
Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on transport, but Waltham Forest is the more affordable option.
Best for
Kensington and Chelsea
Kensington and Chelsea is the better pick for commuters prioritising fast central London access.
Best for
Waltham Forest
Waltham Forest suits families and those prioritising a low-crime neighbourhood.
Kensington and Chelsea vs Waltham Forest: what the data says
Overall, Kensington and Chelsea scores higher on liveability (74/100 vs 64/100), reflecting a better combined picture across safety, transport, schools and environment.
Property in Waltham Forest is more affordable — median price £530k vs £1225k in Kensington and Chelsea, a difference of around 57%. Over the past year prices changed +13.3% in Kensington and Chelsea and +39.5% in Waltham Forest.
Waltham Forest has a lower crime rate (24 incidents per 1,000 residents vs 68 in Kensington and Chelsea). Central London boroughs typically show higher per-resident figures due to large daytime populations.
Kensington and Chelsea edges ahead on public transport connectivity (score 59/100 vs 41/100).
Top-rated postcodes
Frequently asked questions
Compare any two London postcodes
The interactive tool lets you compare any two specific postcodes — not just boroughs — with a full metric-by-metric breakdown.
Open postcode comparison tool →